25to >20.0 pts
ExemplaryAbundant evidence to support all topics. All topics synthesized. Detailed depth of analysis. Purpose of paper crystal clear.19824_1414
20to >15.0 pts
GoodSome evidence to support topics. Some topics are synthesized allowing some ideas to flow. Acceptable depth of analysis. Clear purpose to paper.19824_3103
15to >10.0 pts
Needs ImprovementLittle evidence to support ideas. Shallow depth to analysis. Few ideas are synthesized. Ideas do not flow easily. Overall purpose of paper is unclear.19824_5613
10to >0.0 pts
Below StandardLack of evidence supporting ideas. Little synthesis of ideas. Purpose of paper is vague.19824_7479
0to >0 pts
No Marks19824_9242
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/
25 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOriginality, Creativity, and Style19824_5349
Author uses structure to bring ideas together with Creativity , Originality, and Style. Sophisticated use of vocabulary. Distinct originality of overall composition.
25to >20.0 pts
ExemplaryCreative use of grammatical structure brings ideas together. A clearly unique individual style of overall composition. A sophisticated and original use of vocabulary. Entire composition is clearly a unique and creative piece.19824_6285
20to >20.0 pts
GoodStructure brings ideas together. An emerging style and uniqueness. Vocabulary demonstrates a degree of sophistication and originality.19824_6797
20to >10.0 pts
Needs ImprovementSome ideas flow together. The beginning of an individualistic style. Vocabulary usage is emergent.19824_1769
10to >0.0 pts
Below StandardFew signs of originality. Few indicators of an emerging style. . Vocabulary needs further development.19824_3372
0to >0 pts
No Marks19824_6723
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/
25 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of criterion